Heart failure is significant cause of death and disability in the elderly population, with over one in seven of those over 85 years having the condition. Recent evidence has shown that ACE inhibitors could prevent heart failure as well as treat it. In this article, Dr Mark Davis examines the evidence and discusses the role of angiotensin covenrting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the management of heart failure.
First published June 2006, updated June 2021
Heart failure is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population1. The estimated prevalence of heart failure in the UK is about 900,000 with the incidence increasing significantly with age1. The incidence per 1000 population is less than 0.2 in the under 55 years age group, increasing to 3.0 in those aged 65–74 years, 7.4 in the 75–84 years age group and 11.6 in those aged 85 years and over1,2. This equates to one in 35 people aged 65–74 years in the UK having heart failure, one in 15 aged between 75 and 84 years, and over one in seven aged over 85 years1,3.
The total annual cost of heart failure to the NHS is estimated to be £716m; approximately 1.8 per cent of the total NHS budget4. Hospital inpatient care is the single biggest cost, accounting for over 60 per cent of the total healthcare costs, and hospital admissions are projected to rise by 50 per cent over the next 25 years1.
Indeed, currently heart failure accounts for two per cent of all inpatient bed days, a total of one million bed days in England1, and five per cent of all emergency medical admissions to hospital4 . Furthermore the costs increase with disease severity – severe symptoms can result in costs between eight and 30 times greater than the costs of mild symptoms4,5.
Heart failure is thought to be a significant cause of death in the UK; however, the extent is difficult to establish exactly because guidance on death certificates – that heart failure is not a cause but a mode of death – discourages doctors from noting heart failure as the underlying cause of death. This means that other causes of death, such as coronary heart disease, are more commonly given as the cause of death on the death certificates of people with heart failure1. It was estimated that in 2000, although just under 10,000 deaths due to heart failure were officially recorded, the true number was closer to 24,000 – accounting for at least five per cent of all deaths in the UK1.
The progression of heart failure to severe physical limitation and ultimately death can be gauged by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of the patient. The overall risk of death (i.e. across all risk classifications) is particularly high within the first few weeks of a diagnosis of heart failure – about 20 per cent of patients die within one month and 40 per cent within one year6 – thereafter, mortality is less than 10 per cent per year4.
Quality of life is severely affected in people with heart failure and declines markedly as the severity of disease increases1. Symptoms such as breathlessness and fatigue can substantially limit physical activity; indeed, heart failure has been shown to have a greater impact on the physical functioning domain of the short-form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire than chronic lung disease, arthritis or angina7.
Heart failure can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the heart to pump blood4. The most common cause of heart failure in the UK is coronary artery disease (CAD), including past myocardial infarction (MI), which is responsible for around 50 per cent of all new cases1,8. Other causes include chronic hypertension, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, heart valve disease, congenital heart or blood vessel defects, and excess alcohol1,8.
The treatment of heart failure aims to reduce symptoms, delay progression of the disease, reduce hospitalisation and improve quality of life1,4. Lifestyle changes such as regular exercise (as part of an exercise or rehabilitation programme), smoking cessation and reduction in alcohol consumption are recommended for all heart failure patients4.
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers and diuretics are commonly used in the treatment of heart failure; however, non adherence is a common problem and a significant cause of readmission4,9,10. Consequently simple drug regimens are recommended, with a once-daily administration preferred4.
In some patients coronary revascularisation and other interventions may be considered, particularly if symptoms prove refractory to drug treatment4.
ACE inhibitors and heart failure
European, UK and US guidelines for the treatment of heart failure all agree that ACE inhibitors should be used as first-line therapy in patients with reduced Left Ventricular (LV) function, with or without heart failure symptoms, in the absence of contraindications4,11,12. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors should be used to prevent/delay the development of heart failure in high-risk patients including those with CAD (particularly those with previous MI) or hypertension4,11,12.
Prevention of heart failure
The benefits of ACE inhibitors in patients without signs and symptoms of heart failure have been established in a number of landmark clinical trials13-18.
In the HOPE14 study, ramipril was shown to reduce the risk of new onset heart failure by 23 per cent, and hospitalisation for heart failure by 12 per cent (although this did not reach statistical significance), in high risk patients with cardiovascular disease but without heart failure or low ejection fraction (mean age 66 years). Analysis of these results suggested that the benefits seen were not explained by blood pressure reduction alone and that ACE inhibitors may have additional beneficial mechanisms. These findings were supported by EUROPA15, which investigated patients (mean age 60 years) with stable CAD without heart failure. It found that treatment with perindopril resulted in a significant 39 per cent relative risk reduction in hospital admissions for heart failure (p<0.01).
More recently, looking specifically at an elderly population (average age 72 years) with acute MI and preserved LV function, the PREAMI19 study found that perindopril reduced the composite primary endpoint of death, hospitalisation for heart failure and cardiac remodelling by 38 per cent. This was driven by a significant 46 per cent reduction in the extent of cardiac remodelling, a major cause of heart failure in elderly patients who have had an MI.
The benefit of ACE inhibition use in patients who do have LV dysfunction is also well established. The SOLVD13 study found that ACE inhibitors have beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality in patients with asymptomatic heart failure as well as those with overt, severe heart failure symptoms. Patients with a reduced LV ejection fraction ≤35 per cent were divided into those already receiving treatment for heart failure (mean age 60.8 years) and those who were not (the preventive arm - mean age 59.1 years). Significant risk reductions in death or hospitalisation for heart failure were seen with enalapril in both the treatment (26 per cent) and prevention (20 per cent) arms.
Furthermore, in the prevention arm, enalapril treatment resulted in significantly fewer first hospitalisations for congestive heart failure and fewer patients developing the signs and/or symptoms of heart failure (risk reduction 37 per cent). In fact, progression to either hospitalisation or development of heart failure was delayed by over a year.
The incidence of stroke more than doubles in each successive decade over the age of 55 years. However, it has been shown that ACE inhibitors can also prevent heart failure in patients with cerebrovascular disease. The PROGRESS17 study demonstrated that in patients (mean age 64 years) with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, perindopril plus the diuretic indapamide reduced non fatal MI by 38 per cent and heart failure by 26 per cent compared with placebo18.
Heart failure is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. It produces a substantial burden on patients, carers and the NHS. In large randomised trials ACE inhibitors have demonstrated benefits, not only in the treatment of existing heart failure but also in preventing the development of heart failure in patients at risk. Unfortunately, data suggest that ACE inhibitors are under prescribed, particularly in women and older patients, and the doses used are too low1,20.
As stated in several guidelines, ACE inhibitors should be prescribed in all patients with reduced LV function (with or without heart failure symptoms) and all those at high risk of developing heart failure (such as those with CAD, previous MI or chronic hypertension) in the absence of contraindications4,11,12. Use of ACE inhibitors has the potential to improve patients’ quality of life, delay or prevent disease progression and reduce the need for hospitalisation – providing benefits to the patient, carers and the NHS.
Conflict of interest: Dr Davis has undertaken speaking engagements and attended advisory boards, which have been supported by companies that make and market angiotensin receptor blockers and ace inhibitors.
- Peterson S, Rayner M, Wolstenholme J. Coronary heart disease statistics: heart failure supplement. London: British Heart Foundation, 2002
- Cowie MR, Wood DA, Coats AJ, et al. Incidence and aetiology of heart failure; a population-based study. European Heart Journal 1999; 20: 421–428
- Davies M, Hobbs F, Davis R, et al. Prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening study: a population based study. Lancet 2001; 358: 439–444
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Chronic heart failure. National clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2003. http://www.nice.org.uk/ page.aspx?o=CG005fullguideli ne (date last accessed: 23/05/06)
- Berry C, Murdoch DR, McMurray JJ. Economics of chronic heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure 2001; 3: 283–291
- Cowie MR, Wood DA, Coats AJ, et al. Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study. Heart 2000; 83: 505–510
- Hobbs FD, Kenkre JE, Roalfe, et al. Impact of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction on quality of life: a cross-sectional study comparing common cardiac and medical disorders and a representative adult population. Eur Heart J 2002; 23(23): 1867–1876
- Fox KF, Cowie MR, Wood DA, et al. Coronary artery disease as the cause of incident heart failure in the population. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 228–236]
- Jaarsma T, Dracup K. Determinants of health-care utilisation by patients with chronic heart failure. In Stewart S, Blue L, eds. Improving outcomes in chronic heart failure: a practical guide to specialist nurse intervention. London: BMJ Books, 2001
- Opasich C, Febo O, Riccardi PG, et al. Concomitant factors of decompensation in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 354–357
- Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult. American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association, 2005. http://www.acc.org/ clinical/measures/HF/HFPerfMe asFinal2%5B1%5D032726.pdf (date last accessed: 23/05/06)
- Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: full text (update 2005). The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of CHF of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1115-1140
- Nauman D, Greenberg B. Studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD). Am J Geriatr Cardiol 1993; 2(1): 28– 36
- Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, et al. Effects of an angiotensinconverting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 145– 153
- Fox KM. Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study). Lancet 2003; 362: 782–788
- Daly CA, Fox KM, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of perindopril on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the EUROPA study: results from the PERSUADE substudy. Eur Heart J 2005; 26(14): 1369–1378
- PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based bloodpressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2001; 358: 1033–1041
- PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Effects of a perindoprilbased blood pressure lowering regimen on cardiac outcomes among patients with cerebrovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 475–484
- Ferrari R. PREAMI: Perindopril Remodelling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction. ESC 2005, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Sparrow N, Adlam D, Cowley A, Hampton JR. Difficulties of introducing the National Service Framework for heart failure into general practice in the UK. Eur J Heart Fail Heart Fail 003;5(3): 355–36